SYS · ONLINEPASS · 63.0%
Open Assay
Independent Testing / Est. 2026
BATCH04·26·B
PASS63.0%
N27
PeptidesCognitiveCerebrolysin

Cerebrolysin

/ Porcine-brain-derived peptide preparation (low-molecular-weight neuropeptides plus free amino acids)
TIER 2 · TranslationalN = 0 · TESTING PENDINGLAST REVIEW 2026·04·20
Pass rate
0
Samples
0
Suppliers
Research use onlyAny dose figures below describe what specific cited studies used, reported factually. Nothing on this page is guidance for human use.READ FIRST →

Terms in this page you can click for a plain-English popup: , , , , , , , .

§ A · Identity
Primary sequence— sequence not captured —
MW · CLASS · Porcine-brain-derived peptide preparation (low-molecular-weight neuropeptides plus free amino acids)CATEGORY · Cognitive

Approved in more than 50 countries but not FDA-approved. Substantial Western clinical literature exists including a Cochrane systematic review.

§ B · Mechanism of action

Cerebrolysin is a porcine-brain-derived preparation produced by EVER Neuro Pharma. Proposed mechanisms in peer-reviewed literature include neurotrophic-factor mimicry (BDNF, NGF, GDNF-like activity), reduction of excitotoxicity and oxidative stress, modulation of APP processing and tau phosphorylation, and anti-apoptotic effects via calpain inhibition.

§ C · Human clinical evidence

Substantial — by far the most clinically studied peptide in the cognitive / longevity category. Multi-center Western and Asian RCTs exist for acute ischemic stroke (CASTA, CARS), vascular dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and traumatic brain injury. The 2020 Cochrane systematic review is the appropriate critical touchpoint and reached cautious conclusions.

§ D · Primary literature
DOI10.1002/14651858.CD007026.pub6Ziganshina LE et al.Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · systematic-reviewSystematic review of 7 RCTs concluded no clear beneficial effect of cerebrolysin on death or dependence after acute ischemic stroke; possible increase in non-fatal serious adverse events at higher doses.Limitations: Heterogeneity across included trials in dose, timing, and population. Conclusions contrast with industry-associated meta-analyses.2020
PubMed22426314Heiss WD et al.Cerebrolysin in patients with acute ischemic stroke in Asia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial · Stroke · human-phase-3-rctPrimary endpoint (combined outcome of modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, and NIH Stroke Scale at day 90) not met. Subgroup analyses suggestive in more severe stroke.Limitations: Regional study; subgroup findings hypothesis-generating only.2012
§ E · Dosage ranges studied

Factual reporting of what cited studies used — not a recommendation.

  • Stroke RCTs including CASTA — Adult humans with acute ischemic stroke30-50 mL/day Intravenous, 10-21 daysREFCASTA (Heiss 2012)
§ F · Safety signal

Generally well tolerated across clinical programs. The Cochrane review noted a signal of increased non-fatal serious adverse events at higher doses in stroke, with heterogeneous specific events. Infrequent allergic reactions have been reported.

§ H · Regulatory status

Regulatory status

FDA status:
Not FDA-approved
Compounding:
Compounding eligibility ambiguous
§ I · Notable gaps and controversies

Efficacy remains debated. The 2020 Cochrane systematic review concluded no clear beneficial effect on death or dependence in acute ischemic stroke, while industry-sponsored meta-analyses reach more optimistic conclusions. Heterogeneity across trials in dose, timing, and population is substantial.